Does anyone have $2,500 I can have??

When I first became interested in photography, concert photography to be exact, I was a college student wanting good pictures of my favorite band Jump, Little Children. My dad thought giving me a DSLR would be a great graduation present. I didn't feel comfortable going digital since it had just come on the scene, so I opted for the Canon Rebel 2000 35mm film camera. Wow, typing that out makes me feel old. That camera is now 15 years old. Wasn't I just in college yesterday?

Oh well, now I know where all this gray hair is coming from.

I didn't actually get to take my new camera to many concerts. A college grad with a full time job (and a baby on the way!) doesn't get to travel through the South with the freedom of a college student.

But when that baby Jaina came? I am so glad I had a nice camera to capture her with.

I quickly learned that its not the camera, its the photographer behind it. And I sucked.

I realized I was scrapbooking several "okay" or even downright "crappy" pictures of Jaina while other scrapbookers would center their layout around one amazing picture of their little one. I was determined to learn my camera and learn some basics about photography (composition for the most part) in order to improve my photography of my daughter.

Baby Jayce came 3 years later and I loved having a baby to practice on :)

I finally upgraded to a DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) when Jaina was 5 and Jayce was 2. Its funny to look on my computer now at my files. It's like our world did not exist before 2007. Or, if it did, we didn't have any digital files to document it.

I was shooting with an entry level Canon Rebel XTi and a kit lens in the beginning. It didn't take me long to outgrow that camera. I started becoming frustrated with its lack of focal points and inability to handle any kind of low light situation without grain.

Yes, its true that composition, finding light, and capturing the moment can happen on any camera. I've seen amazing shots from a disposable film camera and now on camera phones! But equipment can start to limit you in ways beyond your control.

I had an opportunity to purchase a Canon 50 D used from a friend of a friend. This was a nice upgrade and has served me well while starting my photography business. The majority of the pictures I post on my blog  come from this camera. Unless I'm lazy. Then you're getting nothing but phone shots :P

I have been wanting to upgrade my camera body for the last year. I'm looking to get a Canon 6D which is a full frame sensor camera. It also has more focus points and performs better than my Canon 50D in low light. I've also wondered for a while now if its my current camera body that is responsible for so many "soft" shots. I thought it might be my Sigma 50mm f/1.4 lens that was the problem. I tried micro adjusting to no avail. If I took a series of 10 pictures, maybe 1/2 would have tack sharp focus while the other ones would just be a little off. And it was driving me crazy. I felt like I couldn't trust my camera.

Recently, I had the opportunity to second shoot for a wedding photographer friend of mine. She uses a Canon EOS Mark iii camera body to shoot for her business. I picked it up to try it out during the wedding I was helping with and was unfamiliar with how it was set to focus. I couldn't wait to get my hands on it and learn how to use it!

Since I'm shooting another wedding tomorrow, my friend let me take the Mark iii home with me this week to practice.

And I'm in love.

Just to give you perspective, the image below was taken with the Mark iii. Same settings and position as the 50 D. Same lens (sigma 50 1.4

The 50 D:

The colors are different and the mark iii responds to light so much better. And the focus looks soft on this one.
Jocelyn became rather bored with me taking her picture so I moved on to less exciting items.

My cell phone:


A different day was better.

And if you are wondering why I have so many pictures of Jocelyn in a swing, well, let's just say it's easier to read the camera manual if the toddler is confined to one space :)

Even though both 50 D and Mark iii models have an Al Servo Mode for focusing, I can tell you that the mark iii outperforms the 50 D on tracking movement.

And that shutter response? Super fast.

Jaina is a goof. Typical teen :)

Once I figured out how to enable back button focusing, using it to "lock" my focus was simple.

Even Shaggy couldn't escape posing as my subject :)

Then I took it inside to test out its performance in low light.

Oh. My. Goodness.

These next two images would have been extremely grainy in this lighting condition. Jayce had his blinds closed and it was evening time with hardly any natural light outside.

And, the window is to their backs anyway. As you can see, Jayce is much less grainy due to the ambient light from his DSi. I could have run a program post editing to remove more of the grain from Jocelyn but I typically don't edit my own personal pics. I'm lazy.

The next day, I used some of Jocelyn's toys as subjects, too. The camera actually uses the center focus point like I told it to! This is really important when shooting eyes in portraits.

After popsicles, I took Jocelyn outside. The sun was definitely setting and it was around 8 PM during these images.

My 50 D would have had a hard time focusing on that shot above.

I told Brian to hold still and smile. This is what he gives me.

To get him back, I am now showing my internet readers all the gray hair he has in his beard :)

My 50 D has always had a hard time figuring out how to focus on Shaggy. With big patches of white and black on him, combined with the fact that he is always moving, just confuses the heck out of my camera.

Our goal was to stay outside past sunset to look for lightning bugs (that's fireflies to you northerners. Again, I'm amazed at how the mark iii handles in low natural light. You can see the bokeh behind the jar is the last little bit of sun before it goes out of sight.

I finally put down this camera by 9:00 PM. I cannot believe I could still focus and get a shot with hardly any light out at all.  Here's my attempt at a silhouette picture:

So, I'm most definitely in love. I'm going to cry hard when I have to hand this camera body back tomorrow to its rightful owner.

Which brings me to my blog title...

Anyone willing to part with $2,500? I can promise you its for a good cause!




Seriously, though, my photography goals this Fall is to upgrade my body to a 6D so I can improve the service and quality I give to my clients. I will be opening up my Fall calendar on August 1st, so if you are local and are interested in Fall Family portraits, let me know!


  1. Okay, now I wanted that camera too! And I have always had a Nikon!! I need some $$ too.

  2. I have a mark ii and have loved it. It's a great camera. But I have eyeballed the mark iii myself. It's drool worthy for sure. These shots turned out great! But I always love your shots! :)

  3. Go and get a sony Alpha A7. I

  4. I had a photographer 2nd shoot a wedding with me. He used the sony mirrorless and a Nikon d2x. I couldn't tell which pictures were shot on which camera. I was astounded. At least go try it! I think people will feel like it is less of a camera because it is do small, but it will seriously blow your mind.

  5. I wrote a big long comment and it disappeared. A sony 1k mirrorless beat out pictures from a 5k Nikon dx in my opinion from a wedding my second shooter used both at

  6. I upgraded to the 6D earlier this year and have been completely blown away! I didn't want to fork out the money for the mark iii - it just didn't seem worth the price difference for the slightly better performance (plus the 6D has some features the iii doesn't even have) and every comparative review I read showed how the 6D outperforms the ii. I absolutely love it and recommend it to EVERYONE!

  7. I'm so grateful to be your photography client, even if you just used your cell phone! :)

  8. Nice photos!

    I just have a Nikon D40. I might upgrade at some point.


Post a Comment

Thanks for commenting!

Popular Posts